Hello there!
With 2025 behind us and fresh capital decisions already underway, this is the moment when investors and founders can step back and see where money actually flowed. Looking at the full year removes the noise of individual deals and short-term headlines, revealing the changes that will shape venture capital decisions in 2026 and beyond.
What we can definitely say is that 2025 was not a year of hesitation in venture capital.
Venture capital in Europe finally started to recover after several difficult years. Total funding grew to about €66 billion, indicating that investor confidence was slowly returning. Still, the money didn’t spread evenly. Most of it went to a smaller group of top companies, especially in AI, where big deals dominated the year and set the market tone.
The differences between regions became clearer in 2025. The UK had a strong year, helped by major investments in AI and a few very large funding rounds. France and Germany, on the other hand, fell behind due to political uncertainty and a lack of growth-stage funding. Southern Europe stood out as the biggest success story, with funding jumping sharply as government support and startup programs helped the region gain real momentum.
Capital is Highly Concentrated at The Top
In 2025, venture capital became even more concentrated at the top of the market. A very small number of startups captured a large share of total funding, showing how money clustered around perceived winners.
In the U.S., just 10 companies took in more than 40% of all VC dollars, with most of that money going into AI-focused startups. This meant billions flowed to a handful of companies, while the majority of startups raised much smaller rounds or struggled to get funded at all.
This change was closely tied to how investors were writing checks. In 2025, the top 10 venture funds accounted for nearly 43% of all capital raised, the highest share in almost a decade. That happened even as the overall number of active investors and new fund entrants dropped sharply. Fewer players were writing checks, and those checks were getting bigger, as investors concentrated their bets on later-stage companies they viewed as safer or more likely to scale in an uncertain market.
The growing influence of the largest VC firms reinforced this pattern. While fundraising across the broader market stayed muted, established funds continued to attract the bulk of LP commitments and held the most capital ready to deploy.
Smaller and newer funds fell away, with new entrants declining to just a fraction of prior years. With scale, reputation, and dry powder on their side, the biggest firms were best positioned to lead large rounds—pulling capital further toward the top and deepening the divide between the market’s largest winners and everyone else.
More Unicrons, With a Big Asterisk
Another big story of 2025 was the return of unicorns. Many startups crossed the $1 billion valuation mark, driven mostly by huge AI funding rounds and strong investor excitement. From the outside, it looked like a major comeback. But not everyone was convinced. Some investors worried that valuations moved too quickly, especially for companies with little revenue or products still in early development.
By the end of the year, a clear split had formed. A small group of companies grew quickly and raised money at higher and higher prices. Others became unicorns mainly because of hype and big expectations around AI. The takeaway from 2025 was clear: unicorns were back, but investors were far more careful about which ones truly deserved the title.
Another important detail from 2025 was how long these unicorns stayed private. Even as fewer companies went public, the total value of private unicorns kept climbing, pushing the combined market value past $3.7 trillion. The number of active unicorns continued to rise, while new unicorn creation slowed compared to the peak years, showing that valuations were stacking up inside private markets rather than being reset through IPOs.
This helped explain why prices stayed high despite growing investor skepticism: capital kept flowing into later-stage private rounds, allowing unicorns to grow larger and more expensive without facing public-market pressure.
2025 Brought a Reality Check for IPOs
Looking back on 2025, the long-awaited return of tech IPOs delivered mixed results. Several high-profile, VC-backed companies finally went public, raising hopes for fresh liquidity after years of drought. But many of the biggest names struggled to hold their share prices after debuting, even as the broader stock market finished the year strong. The pattern felt familiar: early excitement around listings faded as investors grew more cautious and focused on fundamentals and macro uncertainty.
At the same time, 2025 showed that the public markets were not closed for everyone. A smaller group of companies performed well post-IPO, proving that strong stories could still break through. Even so, uneven results made investors and founders more cautious, with many choosing to wait rather than risk a weak debut.
As the year ended, optimism turned toward 2026, with hopes that calmer markets and a few major listings could finally unlock the liquidity VCs have been waiting for.
The First Signals of 2026: What They Tell Us About the Year Ahead
The opening weeks of 2026 delivered a few that might set the tone for how venture capital is likely to behave this year, and what kind of leadership LPs are backing.
Capital continues to flow at the top
The strongest signal came from Andreessen Horowitz, which raised $15 billion across multiple new funds, marking the largest fundraising effort in the firm’s history. This raise happened in a market where many managers struggled to close funds at all.
The message from LPs was unmistakable: scale is still rewarded when paired with access, platform depth, and long-term relevance. Capital flowed to firms seen as builders of enduring technology ecosystems, not just financial intermediaries.
Frontier technology and defense are now core VC categories
Almost simultaneously, Lux Capital announced the close of a $1.5 billion fund, its largest to date, focused on breakthrough science, defense, and advanced industrial technology. The fund was oversubscribed, with roughly $1 billion in additional LP demand turned away.
Lux’s portfolio includes companies such as Anduril Industries, Saildrone, and Astranis, businesses operating at the intersection of software, hardware, and government demand. These companies stand to benefit from increasing U.S. defense spending, procurement reform, and closer coordination between Silicon Valley and Washington.
More eyes on execution in deeptech
Deeptech enters 2026 under a different set of expectations. The market has moved past rewarding ambition alone. Capital allocation is going toward teams that show how scientific advances can be operationalized. Investors are placing greater emphasis on execution, timelines, and real-world adoption than on theoretical feasibility alone.
In Europe, especially, leadership now means closing the gap between research excellence and commercial outcomes. The focus is on companies that can survive the transition from prototype to production and build long-term industrial relevance. Fields like robotics, energy systems, quantum, advanced materials, and AI safety remain strategic, but only when investors can see execution and results delivered.
Higher standards and more selective capital for AI
In a very similar way, AI investment coming from European investors in 2026 is expected to favor focused applications over scale alone. Companies operating in regulated, enterprise, and mission-critical environments are attracting more attention, particularly where reliability, security, and compliance are central requirements.
Capital is increasingly directed toward AI systems that integrate into existing infrastructure and deliver productivity gains or risk reduction. Overall, investor expectations have shifted toward demonstrating how AI fits sustainably into business operations and public systems, rather than showcasing technical capability in isolation.
VCs moving away from climate
In 2025, climate tech became a much harder place for venture capital. Political changes, weaker government support, and the rapid rise of AI pulled money and attention away from green startups. Fundraising for climate and impact funds dropped sharply, and many companies struggled to raise new rounds or grow.
Some investors stepped back completely, while others changed how they talked about their funds, shifting away from climate labels and toward themes like resilience and adaptation.
📄 Interview Spotlight | ESG Fatigue as a Turning Point
This transition away from climate labels and toward more practical thinking also came up in a recent Zero One Hundred Conferences interview with Andera Partners. In the conversation, Andera’s Chief Sustainability Officer, Noëlla de Bermingham, pushed back on the idea that ESG is disappearing. Instead, she explained that ESG fatigue may be a sign of progress, with sustainability becoming part of core business decisions rather than a separate box to check.
The discussion closely reflects what we saw across the market in 2025. Investors are less focused on reporting frameworks and more focused on real risks and costs, like supply chains, energy use, and physical climate impacts. The message was clear: sustainability works best when it’s treated as a smart business strategy, not a label or marketing tool, matching the broader move toward realism and fundamentals in venture and private equity.